SEGA... you actually listened!!!
I agree with most everything else in the article, but I have to call BS on Crysis 2 being better than Crysis 1. From what this guy says about the first Crysis, it sounds like he thinks it was no more than a benchmark. Crysis 2 didn't do anything better than the first, and the things it did differently, it didn't do those things that well either.
"The ideas were solid(...) but it never really managed to make it as enjoyable or immersive as rival shooters Halo 3 a...
seems like the same camera tech as the PSEye, which is good (at least in terms of resolution and frame rates, I could be mistaken). I'm sure it'll compliment Skype very well.
128 socks = 64 pairs = 64 people
You do realize people wear a pair of socks instead of just one, right?
Great news!
eh...
You say Crysis without the '2' implying you mean the series as a whole, as if both Crysis 1 and Crysis 2 played similarly... nothing could be further from the truth. Crysis 2 is a sequel in name only. It was much more scripted, linear, and claustrophobic than the first; I don't know how you couldn't have seen this without having played both games. You say there was "So much freedom and possibilities during combat." Well yeah, in the first Crysi...
"Most other Shooters give you a straight way to go and pulling out some enemies here and there. "
I'm curious, then how did you feel about Crysis 2?
@dark-hollow I know what you're implying. While a PC capable of playing it better than consoles will cost more, you don't have to buy one for the purpose of solely gaming.
As a fan of the Battlefield series, I don't give a damn how good or bad Call of Duty turns out. I'm more interested in DICE making the best Battlefield game they can, rather than just hate on a game I don't even play.
WoW probably is the most profitable single video game ever, though I personally preferred starcraft over the old warcraft games.
Why call of duty is on the list I haven't the faintest idea. Is the list just based on franchise sales?
uhh Odion why didn't you get a DX11 capable card?
Agreed, I highly doubt DICE will be able to max out DX11, but I do think they're pushing DX11 more than anyone else. BF3 being built from the ground up with the DX11 API is something not a lot of PC games in development (or out already) are doing
Well I think I'm covered...
EVGA GTX560 ti SC
Intel Core2Quad Q9550 @2.83 ghz (OC later on)
6gb DDR3 RAM @1333mhz
second that
Blizzard games are always designed to run on very low hardware, but its good news for you that its coming to consoles.
short, but sweet
Was hoping for the UH-60 and a Mark V-type attack boat, but I can't complain over specifics. There's over 20 vehicles on that list.
I personally don't care about how much market share EA gains or loses on MW3. I just want BF3 to be the best damn battlefield DICE has ever made.
You're clearly not a fan of the series. GT5 has received many updates and patches to both the online and offline components, that it hardly plays like the game when it first launched.